Roberto Somoza v. Ramon Lavado Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where non- 7 parties had been silent in an action, the defendant could not claim that those non-parties had “a 8 legally protected interest in the action”
• holding that, as to an analogous penalty bar in the FDIC’s authorizing statute, “[t]here is no question that [12 U.S.C. § 1825(b)(3)] exempts the FDIC from penalties assessed after it becomes the receiver.”
• “Orange County cannot claim that the [non-party] districts have a legally protected interest in the action unless the districts themselves claim that they have such an interest, and the districts have been silent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).