Roberto Hernandez Miranda v. Clark County, Nevada Morgan Harris Thomas Rigsby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal because the public defender represented the plaintiff's interest during criminal proceeding, not the state’s interests
• affirming dismissal because the public defender represented the plaintiff’s interest during criminal proceeding, not the state’s interests
• upholding dismissal of complaint on 10 basis that public defender was not acting on behalf of county for purposes of § 1983 in 11 representing plaintiff’s interests
• upholding dismissal of complaint 12 on basis that public defender was not acting on behalf of county for purposes of § 1983 in 13 representing plaintiff's interests
• upholding dismissal of 24 complaint on basis that public defender was not acting on behalf of county for purposes of § 25 1983 in representing plaintiff’s interests
• upholding dismissal of 28 11 Case 2:21-cv-08077-MEMF-PLA Document 45 Filed 02/17/23 Page 12 of 17 Page ID #:655 1 complaint on basis that public defender was not acting on behalf of county for purposes of Section 2 1983 in representing plaintiff’s interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).