Skip to main content
· 10/1/1998

Robert Young v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 152 F.3d 1018
  • 1998 WL 518481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that substantial change in employer’s explanation for decision to terminate employee supported an inference of pretext
  • stating comparative evidence is not the “exclusive means by which a plaintiff may establish an inference of discrimination”
  • applying McDonnell Douglas analysis to claims that do not put forth any direct evidence of discrimination
  • stating comparative evidence is not the “exclusive means by which a plaintiff may establish an inference of discrimination”
  • employer offered different explanations and evidence that would allow reasonable trier of fact to disbelieve each explanation
  • employer offered different explanations and evidence that would allow reasonable trier of fact to disbelieve each explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Doty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.