Robert Yeftich v. Navistar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiffs’ allegations failed to “offer[] facts that suggest a motive for the union’s alleged failure to deal with the grievances’
• affirming lower court’s dismissal where plaintiff failed to provide factual support for claim that union officials lied during grievance process
• “construing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, accepting as true all well-pleaded facts and drawing reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs’ favor”
• affirming dismissal of the plaintiffs’ breach of duty of fair representation claims for failure to make non-conclusory allegations
• dismissing claim under 12(b)(6) where “plaintiffs ha[d] not gone beyond their conclusory state-of-mind allegations”
• finding plaintiffs’ allegations deficient when they failed to specify “the content of the grievances,” the union official processing plaintiffs’ grievances, or the “dates or even a time frame across which grievances were filed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).