Skip to main content
· 7/1/1996

Robert WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sammy DRAKE; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants

Citations

  • 87 F.3d 1073
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 7897
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4914
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15752
  • 1996 WL 360590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the agency law of the state where the alleged tort occurred
  • dismissing tort claim based on assault, battery, and false imprisonment, in part because they occurred within scope of tortfeasor’s federal employment and the United States may not be found liable for those intentional torts
  • Under California’s “broad definition” of scope of 17 employment, “even tortious conduct that violates an employee’s official duties or disregards the 18 employer’s express orders may nonetheless be within the scope of employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Ferguson, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.