· 8/19/2014
Robert Williams, Sr. v. State of California
Citations
- 764 F.3d 1002
- 2014 WL 4090545
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16061
- 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,139
- 124 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal without leave to amend where plaintiffs failed in two chances to sufficiently plead their claims, including an Establishment Clause claim
- affirming dismissal of amended 19 complaint without leave to amend based on futility where, despite having received “two chances to articulate clear and lucid theories underlying their claims” the plaintiffs merely 20 repeated allegations previously found deficient
- “The fact that Plaintiffs have already had two chances to articulate clear and lucid theories underlying their claims, and they failed to do so, demonstrates that amendment would be futile.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Pregerson, Wardlaw, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.