Robert Wexler v. Theresa Lepore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating and remanding where the district court found that the federal action “would interfere with the ongoing state action,” but legally erred by not determining whether the federal action would create “an undue interference on state proceedings”
• “[T]he [Younger] doctrine usually applies in cases involving criminal prosecution or the criminal justice system.”
• “[T]he [Younger] doctrine usually applies in cases involving criminal prosecution or the criminal justice system.”
• “[T]he [Younger] doctrine usually applies in cases involving criminal prosecution or the criminal justice system.”
• “[W]ithout showing an undue interference on state proceedings, abstention is not permitted.”
• “[W]ithout showing an undue interference on state proceedings, abstention is not permitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).