Robert Wexler v. Arthur Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that equal protection is not violated by letting different counties use different voting systems
• noting that DREs “do not record ambiguous indicia of voter intent that can later be reviewed during a manual recount”
• recognizing that equal protection lets different counties use different voting systems
• court addressed merits of challenge to touchscreen voting system brought by registered voter with others
• court addressed merits of challenge to touchscreen voting system brought by registered voter with others
• challenge to manual-recount procedures under which some ballots might “receive a different, and allegedly inferior, type of review in the event of a manual recount”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).