Skip to main content
· 7/8/2013

Robert Wehrle v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Citations

  • 719 F.3d 840
  • 2013 WL 3379345
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Court must “construe all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmovant . . . and draw all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor”
  • the provisions in a “clear and unambiguous” policy “must be given their plain, ordinary, and popular meaning, and the policy will be applied as written, unless it contravenes public policy”
  • “Under Illinois law, an insurance policy is a contract, and the general rules governing the interpretation of other types of contract also govern the interpretation of insurance policies.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Wood, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.