Robert W. Steffens and Gerardo Garcia v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs sufficiently alleged collusion, but dismissing the complaint on statute of limitations grounds
• rejecting argument that employer-union collusion infects Public Law Board simply because each Board has one union representative and one company representative
• rejecting argument that employer-union collusion infects Public Law Board simply because each Board has one union representative and one company representative
• plaintiffs not entitled to judicial review simply because they disagree with Board's decision
• plaintiffs not entitled to judicial review simply because they disagree with Board’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).