Robert W. Mauthe, M.D. P.C. v. Optum, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “So to be an ad, the fax must promote goods or services to be bought or sold, and it should have profit as an aim…. [T]here must be a nexus between the fax and the purchasing decisions of an ultimate purchaser….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Physicians Healthsource Inc v. Cephalon Inc
  Third Circuit· 2020-03-30· cited 123×
• Richard Fischbein v. Olson Research Group Inc
  Third Circuit· 2020-05-15· cited 24×
• Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. PDR Network, LLC
  Fourth Circuit· 2023-09-06· cited 13×
• Robert W Mauthe MD PC v. Millennium Health LLC
  Third Circuit· 2023-01-19· cited 7×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Pro Design, P.C.
  Third Circuit· 2009-05-12· cited 113×

Other cases named Robert W. Mauthe, M.D. P.C. v. Optum, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. Optum, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2019-11-25