Robert W. Halliman v. Austin Peay State University

Syllabus

This is an action for violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 4- 21-101 to -1004 (\THRA\). The plaintiff, an associate professor at a state university, applied for promotion to the rank of full professor. While his application was under review, the plaintiff filed an age discrimination charge against the university with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (\EEOC\). A short time later, the university denied the plaintiff's promotion based on his alleged lack of high-quality scholarship. The trial court dismissed the action at the summary judgment stage, reasoning that the plaintiff had not produced evidence to rebut the university's stated reason for denying his promotion. This appeal followed. The plaintiff contends that the trial court erred because there was evidence that the university's administration knowingly violated university policy by reevaluating the merits of the plaintiff's peer-reviewed scholarship. We affirm the trial court's judgment in all respects.