· 12/6/2002
Robert Vinson Brannum v. William Lake, Brig. Gen., U.S.A.F.
Citations
- 311 F.3d 1127
- 354 U.S. App. D.C. 73
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24654
- 2002 WL 31730159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts are prohibited from directly reviewing decision to impose NJP
- opining that the “prohibition” against civil courts reviewing “the acts of court martial, within the scope of its jurisdiction and duty . . . surely includes challenges to non-judicial punishment offered in lieu of a court martial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Henderson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.