Robert v. Tesson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that children had acclimated to a particular country by attending kindergarten, vacationing with certain family members, and visiting others there
• observing that focusing on shared parental intent makes easy cases hard and leads to questionable results in determining habitual residence
• observing that focusing on shared parental intent makes easy cases hard and leads to questionable results in determining habitual residence
• stating that the shared intent rule “turns the Hague Convention on its head” and is clearly contrary to Sixth Circuit precedent
• acknowledging that “a general objection to a magistrate judge’s report, which fails to specify the issues of contention, does not suffice to preserve an issue for appeal”
• regretting that in one case, the shared parental intent standard led to parents’ plans for living in one country outweighing three years of their children’s residency and schooling in another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).