Robert Tutman v. Wbbm-Tv, Inc./cbs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the employer “responded promptly to [the employee’s] harassment complaint” by “beg[inning to] investigat[e] [the employee’s] allegation on the day of the incident”
• noting that remedial action that makes a victim worse off is ineffective per se
• observing that in cases finding constructive discharge, plaintiffs were subjected to severe and sustained harassment
• concluding investigation was sufficient as a matter of law when it included multiple interviews, plaintiff did not dispute a single paragraph, and plaintiff failed to cite any cases in support
• noting that remedial action that makes a victim worse off is ineffective per se
• “Working conditions for constructive discharge must be even more egregious than the high standard for hostile work environment … .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).