Skip to main content
· 4/24/1984

Robert T. Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. And United Transportation Union

Citations

  • 732 F.2d 1188
  • 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2097
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Supreme Court’s reasoning in DelCostello v. International Board of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 158, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 2287, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983)
  • applying § 10(b) of the NLRA to duty of fair representation claims under the Railway Labor Act
  • applying the NLRA statute of limitations period to an action against a union for breach of the duty of fair representation
  • applying DelCostello v. Council. Int’l Board of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 158 (1983
  • hybrid suit, but statute of limitations ruling only on breach of duty of fair representation claim against the union
  • “[T]he [Supreme Court] characterized the source of the duty of fair representation under 22 the NLRA as identical to that under the RLA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Sloviter, Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.