Skip to main content
· 1/21/1997

Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald Tober

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 252
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 818
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,476
  • 1997 WL 17925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a district court, after issuing an order of remand, may make an award of attorney fees and costs in a separate order’
  • holding that Rule 54(d)(2)(B)’s 14-day requirement applies to “a motion for attorney fees in connection with remand”
  • holding that “a district court, after issuing an order of remand, may make an award of attorney fees and costs in a separate order”
  • holding that this court has jurisdiction to review the award or denial of attorney fees under § 1447(c)
  • noting that “the district court should exercise [its] discretion in the first instance,” and refusing to consider district court’s refusal to grant attorney fees as an exercise of discretion where circumstances indicated that the district court did not consider the matter
  • joining Moore v. Permanente Med. Grp., 981 F.2d 443, 445 (9th Cir. 1992) in holding that “[t]he award of fees pursuant to section 1447(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Norris, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.