Skip to main content
· 6/28/2000

Robert St. Pierre v. Roger D. Cowan, Warden, Menard Correctional Center

Citations

  • 217 F.3d 939
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15305
  • 2000 WL 862521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a waiver was not valid because no court ever had a chance to question the petitioner on the record as to his intentions and understanding
  • finding that a waiver was not valid because no court ever had a chance to question the petitioner on the record as to his intentions and understanding
  • discussing the application of due process to state postconvic- tion relief
  • noting the lack of “any kind of proceeding, formal or informal, at which any court was able to assure itself that [the] waiver . . . satisfied the requirements for a knowing and voluntary waiver and that [the petitioner] intended it to be a waiver”
  • waiver can be invalidated if a judge affirmatively misinforms a defendant about the one juror rule
  • trial judge’s ambiguous reference to unanimity could reasonably imply that unanimity was required both to impose or reject the death penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.