Skip to main content
· 8/15/1978

Robert Schenck v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Merkin & Co., Inc., Gac Properties Credit, Inc. And Gac, Inc.

Citations

  • 583 F.2d 58
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1505
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding abuse of discretion in sua sponte dismissal where inter alia there was no request for dismissal, no pre-trial conference, and no “judicial participation indicating that a dismissal might be in the offing.”
  • finding abuse of discretion in sua sponte dismissal where inter alia there was no request for dismissal, no pre-trial conference, and no \judicial participation indicating that a dismissal might be in the offing.\
  • no request for dismissal had been made and no judicial participation indicating that a dismissal might be in the offing
  • no request for dismissal had been made and no judicial participation indicating that a dismissal might be in the offing.
  • dismissal sua sponte for failure to prosecute where case is only 13 months old and plaintiff's newly-appointed counsel indicated a willingness to proceed constitutes an abuse of discretion
  • “The law is clear. The district court has the power to dismiss for failure to prosecute, on its own motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Moore, Van GRAAFEILAND

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.