Robert Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statements that the Board wanted “someone younger” to be direct evidence of age discrimination
• finding that one decisionmaker’s comment about wanting “someone younger” is direct evidence of age discrimination
• statement about Board wanting plaintiff to retire “would require an inference to conclude that retirement was a proxy for age”
• statement was not ambiguous and does not require an inference about age

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).