Skip to main content
· 8/5/2013

Robert Saterdalen v. James Spencer

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 838
  • 2013 WL 3970207
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prosecutor entitled to absolute immunity because his acts in reviewing and approving the complaint against plaintiff were taken to initiate the criminal prosecution
  • under Rule 12(b)(6), court may consider some public records or materials “necessarily embraced by the pleadings”
  • Eighth Circuit reaffirming holding in Imbler, that prosecutors are absolutely immune for acts done in the role of an advocate for the State
  • de novo review of district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings
  • absolute immunity applied to prosecutor’s acts in reviewing and approving complaint
  • “Where the alleged constitutional violation involves an arrest pursuant to a warrant, ‘the fact that a neutral magistrate has issued a warrant is the clearest indication that the officers acted in an objectively reasonable manner.’” (brackets omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.