· 8/5/2013
Robert Saterdalen v. James Spencer
Citations
- 725 F.3d 838
- 2013 WL 3970207
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16099
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutor entitled to absolute immunity because his acts in reviewing and approving the complaint against plaintiff were taken to initiate the criminal prosecution
- under Rule 12(b)(6), court may consider some public records or materials “necessarily embraced by the pleadings”
- Eighth Circuit reaffirming holding in Imbler, that prosecutors are absolutely immune for acts done in the role of an advocate for the State
- de novo review of district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings
- absolute immunity applied to prosecutor’s acts in reviewing and approving complaint
- “Where the alleged constitutional violation involves an arrest pursuant to a warrant, ‘the fact that a neutral magistrate has issued a warrant is the clearest indication that the officers acted in an objectively reasonable manner.’” (brackets omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.