· 5/1/1996
Robert S, FURR, Leslie Woosley, Bernard E. Ozinga, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 82 F.3d 980
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10024
- 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,066
- 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1325
- 1996 WL 218841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Statistical evil dence which fails to properly take into account nondiseriminatory explanations does not permit an inference of pretext.”
- “[I]t is the manager’s perception of the employee’s performance that is relevant, not plaintiff’s subjective evaluation of his own relative performance.”
- “It is the manager’s perception of the employee’s performance that is relevant….”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldock, McWilliams, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.