· 1/23/2002
Robert R. Rowe v. Fort Lauderdale
Citations
- 279 F.3d 1271
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 885
- 2002 WL 86675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutor who proffered perjured testimony and fabricated exhibits at trial was still entitled to absolute immunity
- holding that immunity extends to all actions the prosecutor takes while performing his function as an advocate for the government
- stating that absolute immunity applies to a prosecutor’s initiation of a criminal prosecution
- stating Jones \reject[ed] an exception for the testimony of `complaining witnesses'\
- stating Jones “reject[ed] an exception for the testimony of ‘complaining witnesses’”
- stating Jones “rejected] an exception for the testimony of ‘complaining witnesses’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Musgrave
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.