Skip to main content
· 1/23/2002

Robert R. Rowe v. Fort Lauderdale

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 1271
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 885
  • 2002 WL 86675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor who proffered perjured testimony and fabricated exhibits at trial was still entitled to absolute immunity
  • holding that immunity extends to all actions the prosecutor takes while performing his function as an advocate for the government
  • stating that absolute immunity applies to a prosecutor’s initiation of a criminal prosecution
  • stating Jones \reject[ed] an exception for the testimony of `complaining witnesses'\
  • stating Jones “reject[ed] an exception for the testimony of ‘complaining witnesses’”
  • stating Jones “rejected] an exception for the testimony of ‘complaining witnesses’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Musgrave

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.