· 4/1/2025
Robert Phinizee a/k/a Robert Delawrance Phinizee v. State of Mississippi
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “RFRA’s ‘substantial burden’ test ‘requires an objective inquiry into the extent of the governmental pressure on the plaintiff’s exercise of religion.’” (quoting Kravitz v. Purcell, 87 F.4th 111, 126 (2d Cir. 2023)) (emphasis added)
- “[RFRA] prohibits the government [] from substantially burdening an individual’s exercise of religion.” 1 The district court found that the CFTC was entitled to sovereign immunity, and Obie does not challenge that ruling. 4 (alterations adopted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.