Robert Panger v. Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, where the plaintiff offered a lay opinion in his own testimony, “the defendant should have been accorded the right to counter that evidence with either factual evidence of its own or properly proffered expert testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).