Robert Padron v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that governmental immunity was not waived and that dismissal was required “because the requisite causal nexus between the alleged condition and [claimant]’s injury [was] lacking”
• recognizing that “merely furnish[ing] a circumstance ‘that makes the injury possible’” does not satisfy the TTCA’s causation requirement either (quoting Dallas Cnty. Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Bossley, 968 S.W.2d 339, 343 (Tex. 1998
• explaining that to establish waiver under section 101.021(2), the condition or use of the property must be a proximate cause of the injury
• explaining that to establish waiver under section 101.021(2), the condition or use of the property must be a proximate cause of the injury
• noting that a Rule 91a dismissal is analogous to a plea to the jurisdiction, requiring a court to determine whether the pleadings allege facts showing jurisdiction
• stating whether Rule 91a’s dismissal standard is met depends exclusively on the pleading of the cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).