Robert P. Sepeda v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that use of prior DUI convictions under later-enacted enhancement statute violated Ex Post Facto Clause since “the punishment is for the offense that appellant was tried for and . . . increased because of the recidivist nature of appellant’s conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).