Robert Oja v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the amended complaint does not relate back to the earlier complaint because the acts of disclosure were \distinct in time and place\
• concluding that the amended complaint does not relate back to the earlier complaint because the acts of disclosure were “distinct in time and place”
• holding that hosting information on a website does not continuously republish the information
• noting that the plaintiff had alleged that the second publication had occurred on a “different [Corps of Engineers] website” (emphasis added)
• noting that the plaintiff had alleged that the second publication had occurred on a “different [Corps of Engineers] website” (emphasis added)
• hosting “concerns technical maintenance rather than the particularized and original effort involved in publishing information to an audience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).