Skip to main content
· 10/17/2002

Robert O. Mudge v. United States

Citations

  • 308 F.3d 1220
  • 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2015
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21661
  • 2002 WL 31319815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Congress is presumed to be aware of an administrative or judicial interpretation of a statute.\ (citing Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 580 (1978))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Schall, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.