Robert Norlock v. City of Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• time limits in Federal Rule 4 may be enlarged by court pursuant to Rule 6(b)
• Service by mail was not perfected and no subsequent personal service was attempted
• where counsel discovered three days before the 120-day period expired that he had served the wrong defendant, but did not move for an extension of time to serve pursuant to Rule 6(b
• language of Rule 4(j) is mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).