Robert Michael Hanahan v. Dennis M. Luther, Warden and William Pilcher, Chief Probation Officer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a federal prisoner's challenge to parole revocation proceedings is prop- erly brought under § 2241
• prior testimony under oath admissible where parolee and his lawyer were present at prior proceeding and had a full opportunity to participate
• four-month delay raised “due process question,” but was not unconstitutional where parolee did not request prompt hearing and was not prejudiced
• absence of testimony was not prejudicial in specific instance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).