Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding federal 5 habeas courts “may consider the entire state-court record, including evidence that was presented 6 only to the trial court.”
• holding federal habeas courts “may consider 15 || the entire state-court record .. ..”
• rejecting the argument that a trial “court must conduct comparative juror analysis” under Batson step three (emphasis in original)
• rejecting the argument that a trial “court must conduct comparative juror analysis” under Batson step three (emphasis in original)
• reaching merits of claim where state waived the defense of procedural default
• “A comparative analysis of the application of reasoning applied to [B]lack versus [W]hite jurors is often the best if not ‘the only means we will have for assessing the state court’s factfinding.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-07-25· cited 4×
• Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-10-14· cited 1×
• Robert McDaniels v. Richard Kirkland
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-02-26