Robert Magneson v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting otherwise disallowed testimony is permitted because it is necessary to complete the chronological sequence of events
• implication of an accused’s assertion of rights may appropriately be made by trial counsel in rebuttal
• “That an inference of consciousness of guilt can be drawn from the destruction of evidence is well- recognized in the law.”
• quot- ing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).