Robert Lowry, MD Neurology and Neurophysiology Associates, PA JCMLR, PA And Lynnell Lowry, MD v. Peter A. Tarbox, MD and/or D/B/A Peter A. Tarbox, MD PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the assaults were separate and distinct because the evidence showed that the victim sustained injuries to different parts of her body
• holding invited error doctrine did not apply where defendant “failed to object, actively participated in crafting [a portion of] the challenged instruction, and affirmed it was ‘fine’”
• applying plain error review where the defendant “failed to object, actively participated in crafting the challenged instructions, and affirmed it was ‘fine’”
• finding that the defendant’s decisions to grab the victim’s hair, throw her down the embankment, and repeatedly punch her face and head required a separate thought process than his decision to pin down the victim while she was on the ground and strangle her throat to quiet her screaming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).