Skip to main content
· 9/10/1998

Robert Lee Parrish v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 718 A.2d 133
  • 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 175
  • 1998 WL 574777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘If the meaning of the statute is plain on its face, resort to legislative history or other extrinsic aids to assist in its interpretation is not necessary.’ ”
  • “It is well established that the word ‘shall’ is ‘a term which creates a duty, not an option.’” (quoting Riggs Nat’l Bank v. District of Columbia, 581 A.2d 1229, 1257 (D.C. 1990))
  • the act “creat[ed] a new system for compensating crime victims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Schwelb, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.