Robert L. Howell v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “[t]he plain and unambiguous language of section 1114(Z) requires that a claimant be in need of regular aid and attendance ‘as the result of service-connected disability’ ” (quoting 38 U.S.C. § 1114(0))- Since section 1114(o
• holding that the \[t]he plain and unambiguous language of section 1114(l) requires that a claimant be in need of regular aid and attendance 'as the result of service- connected disability'\ (quoting 38 U.S.C. § 1114(l)). Since section 1114(o
• electing not to address notice errors raised for the first time to the Court under Maggitt
• electing not to address notice errors raised for the first time to the Court under Maggitt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).