Skip to main content
· 10/17/2001

Robert L. Crill, Inc. v. Bond

Citations

  • 76 S.W.3d 411
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 6943
  • 2001 WL 1231865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no professional relationship with the client was required when the parties failed to adequately brief the issue and, in any event, the evidence was sufficient to allow the fact-finder to infer that an attorney-client relationship did, in fact, exist
  • holding that no professional relationship with the client was required when the parties failed to adequately brief the issue and, in any event, the evidence was sufficient to allow the fact-finder to infer that an attorney-client relationship did, in fact, exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lagarde, James, Dodson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.