Robert L. Caudle v. American Arbitration Association

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that issue may be whether arbitrators and organizing bodies are real parties in interest, not whether immunity applies
• expressing doubt that arbitral immunity should bar recovery of fees from an arbitrator who fails to provide the promised arbitration services at all
• expressing doubt that arbitral immunity should bar recovery of fees from an arbitrator who fails to provide the promised arbitration services at all
• stating, but not deciding, that if the “AAA had pocketed the money without arbitrating the dispute, it is unlikely that the AAA could claim ‘immunity’ in response to a demand for a refund (or an order to furnish the arbitration service for which it had been paid)”
• “[A] litigant files an appeal, rather than suing the judge or the court or which the judge is a member, if he does not like decisions by the trial court . . . .”
• “[A] litigant files an appeal, rather than suing the judge or the court or which the judge is a member, if he does not like decisions by the trial court . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).