Skip to main content
· 2/13/2012

Robert Johnson v. G.D.F., Incorpora

Citations

  • 668 F.3d 927
  • 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1217
  • 2012 WL 456484
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the attorney did not establish his actual billing rate where he did not show how much he was actually paid and for what kind of work
  • “The best evidence of an attorney’s market rate is his or her actual billing rate for similar work.”
  • “It was an abuse of discretion for the district court to decide that the market must distinguish between FLSA and Title VII cases. Either it does or it doesn’t, but it is not the court’s job to say that it should.”
  • “substantial settlement offers should be considered in determining reasonable attorney’s fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Tinder, Magnus-Stinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.