· 3/2/1987
Robert Johansen v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Citations
- 810 F.2d 1377
- 100 A.L.R. Fed. 871
- 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1468
- 3 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 142
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the amended complaint for breach of implied and express warranty related to the original products liability claim even though the theory of recovery was wholly different
- “Therefore, we conclude that Rule 15(c), the federal relation back rule, applies and the district court erred in applying the Texas relation back rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Davis, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.