Robert Jerome Espinoza-Matthews v. People of the State of California, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding pro se habeas petitioner was 28 //// 1 entitled to equitable tolling because despite his diligence he was deprived of his legal papers for 2 11 months of the one-year AEDPA limitations period.
• equitable tolling warranted 23 where prisoner was repeatedly denied access to requested legal materials 24 while confined in protective administrative segregation for eleven months
• “Because [petitioner] 8 was a pro se petitioner at all relevant times, we hold that the district court should have 9 exercised its discretion to review the supplemental evidence that [petitioner] submitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).