· 7/28/1995
Robert J. Groden v. Random House, Inc., the New York Times Company, Inc., the New York Times Sales, Inc., and Gerald Posner
Citations
- 61 F.3d 1045
- 143 A.L.R. Fed. 721
- 23 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2203
- 35 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1547
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding district court did not err in sua sponte converting motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6
- noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
- noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
- noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
- nonmoving party submitted affidavits, testimony, and technical data and had “ample opportunity to present evidence outside the pleadings”
- “In New York, there is no common-law right of privacy ... and sections 50 and 51 afford the only available remedy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Feinberg, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.