Skip to main content
· 7/28/1995

Robert J. Groden v. Random House, Inc., the New York Times Company, Inc., the New York Times Sales, Inc., and Gerald Posner

Citations

  • 61 F.3d 1045
  • 143 A.L.R. Fed. 721
  • 23 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2203
  • 35 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1547
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court did not err in sua sponte converting motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6
  • noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
  • noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
  • noting that the party opposing the motion must be given “sufficient notice” and an opportunity to respond
  • nonmoving party submitted affidavits, testimony, and technical data and had “ample opportunity to present evidence outside the pleadings”
  • “In New York, there is no common-law right of privacy ... and sections 50 and 51 afford the only available remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Feinberg, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.