Skip to main content
· 6/7/1994

Robert J. Anderson v. United States

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 704
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13412
  • 1994 WL 241333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that such a claim is not constitutional or jurisdictional in nature
  • “A petitioner simply cannot raise a nonconstitutional or nonjurisdictional issue in a § 2255 motion if the issue could have been raised on direct appeal but was not.”
  • fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice exception applies only to claims of factual, as opposed to legal, innocence
  • claim that statutory elements of crime not met, not constitutional or jurisdictional
  • distinguishing between “legal innocence” and “actual” or “factual” innocence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Lively, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.