Skip to main content
· 10/15/1986

Robert Inv. Co., Inc. v. Eastbank, Inc.

Citations

  • 496 So. 2d 465
  • 1986 La. App. LEXIS 7864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Parol evidence is not admissible to modify a written instrument pertaining to the establishment of a predial servitude.”
  • \Parol evidence is not admissible to modify a written instrument pertaining to the establishment of a predial servitude.\
  • “Parol evidence is not admissible to modify a written instrument pertaining to the establishment of a predial servitude.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lottinger, Shortess and Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.