Robert Ingersoll & Bro. v. Shapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no cause of action where the delay was “not as egregiously late as the response” in Gutierrez
• finding that it was sufficient for the agency to inform the requestor that 18 it would apply similar exemptions to future productions as were applied to a subset of documents 19 previously produced
• finding that it was sufficient for the agency to inform the requestor that 18 it would apply similar exemptions to future productions as were applied to a subset of documents 19 previously produced
• finding that it was sufficient for the agency to inform the requestor that 18 it would apply similar exemptions to future productions as were applied to a subset of documents 19 previously produced
• “That 20 the EPA’s determination was not made . . . until nearly a year after the request does 21 not necessarily make the EPA’s deficiency actionable under the FOIA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).