Robert Hull, Jr. v. John Dutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Alabama’s longevity pay No. 07-3377 23 statute is not a “minimum labor standard” in part because the “statute applies only to its own employees and not to its citizens generally”
• noting that “[a]l-though the Supreme Court did not define what it considered to be a ‘minimum labor standard,’ ” such statutes are “valid and unexceptional exercise[s] of the [state’s] police power,” and a state “longevity pay statute is not such a beast”
• noting that “[a]lthough the Supreme Court did not define what it considered to be a ‘minimum labor stan- dard,’ ” such statutes are “valid and unexceptional exercise[s] of the [state’s] police power,” and a state “longevity pay statute is not such a beast”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).