Robert Hudson v. T. Hedge and City of Indianapolis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff \cannot use a new suit to contend that the disposition of the first was mistaken\
• reasoning that, where a pro se litigant’s first complaint was dismissed and he did not appeal from the dismissal, he “cannot use a new suit to contend that the disposition of the first was mistaken”
• plaintiff “cannot use a new suit to contend that the disposition of the first was mistaken”
• “[N]ew evidence does not relieve a litigant of the preclusive effect of a (federal) judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).