Robert Henry Hartford v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the evidence was held to require a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity notwithstanding defendant’s testimony that he was sane, and the application, as the law of the case, of a more restrictive standard of insanity than that established by this court in McDonald
• where the evidence was held to require a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity notwithstanding defendant's testimony that he was sane, and the application, as the law of the case, of a more restrictive standard of insanity than that established by this court in McDonald

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).