Robert Harvey Santee v. Stacy Lynn Santee - concurring in part and dissenting in part

Syllabus

I concur completely in the majority's decisions pertaining to (1) the allocation of the parties' debt (2) the imputation of income to wife for the purpose of calculating child support and (3) wife's request for her attorney's fees as alimony in solido. In my judgment, there is no error regarding any of these matters. I dissent, however, from the majority's decision to award wife \rehabilitative\ alimony rather than alimony in futuro. I do so because, I believe, the evidence clearly and overwhelmingly preponderates against the trial court's \rehabilitative\ decision.