Robert H. Laflower v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when an ALJ disagrees with medical opinions, “[t]he 12 ALJ must do more than offer his conclusions[; h]e must set forth his own interpretations and 13 explain why they, rather than the doctors,’ are correct”
• requiring the ALJ to identify the evidence supporting 11 the found conflict to permit the Court to meaningfully review the ALJ’s finding
• The ALJ is required to do more than offer his 12 conclusions, he “must set forth his interpretations and explain why they, rather than 13 the doctors’, are correct.”
• The ALJ is 8 required to do more than offer his conclusions, he “must set forth his interpretations 9 and explain why they, rather than the doctors’, are correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).